CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background Of Study
The oil boom of the 1970s made Nigeria neglected its agricultural and light
manufacturing bases in favour of an unhealthy dependence on crude oil. In
2000 oil and gas export accounted for more than 98% of export earning and
about 83% of federal government revenue. New oil wealth the concurrent
decline of other economic model fuelled massive migration to the cities and led
to increasingly wide spread poverty especially in rural areas. A collapse of basic
infrastructures and social services since the early 1980s accompanied this trend
(CIA 2010).
By 2000 Nigeria‟s per capita income had plunged to about one quarter of its
mid 1970s high below the level at independence. Along with the endemic
malaise of Nigeria‟s non-oil sector the economy continues to witness massive
growth of „informal sector‟ economic activities estimated by some to be as high
as 75% of the total economy. The U.S United State remains Nigeria‟s customer
for crude oil accounting for 40% of the country‟s total oil export Nigeria
provides about 10% of overall U.S oil import and ranks as the fifth-largest
source for U.S imported oil and ranked 44th worldwide and third in Africa in
factor output. (Adeolu B Anyawale 1997).
Nigeria economy is struggling to leverage the country‟s vast wealth in fossil
fuels in other to displace the crushing poverty that affects about 57% of its
population. Economics refers to the consistence of vast wealth in national
resources and extreme poverty in developing countries like Nigeria as a
„resource course‟. 80% of Nigeria‟s revenue flow to the government 16%
covers operational cast and the remaining 4% goes to investors. World Bank has
estimated that as a result of corruption 80% of energy revenues benefit only
1% of the population (Econspapers hosted by Swedish Business School Orebro
University).
Generally the manufacturing sector which plays a catalytic role in a modern
economy has many dynamic benefits crucial for economic transformation is a
leading sector in many aspects (Oguma 1995) says it creates investment capital
at a faster rate than any other sector of the economy. Available evidence showed
that the share of manufacturing value in the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) was
3.2% in 1960. In 1977 its share of GDP increased to 5.4% and in 1992 grew to
13%. The share of the manufacturing in GDP fell to 6.2 in 1993 while overall
manufacturing capacity utilization rate fluctuated downwards to 2.4% in 1998.
In 2003 the manufacturing sector accounted for 4% of the Gross Domestic
Product (GDP) (Ojo 1987:256). A country is industrialised when at least one-
quarter of this Gross Domestic Product(GDP) is produced in its industrial
output arises in the manufacturing section of industrial sectors and when at
least one length of its total population is employed in the industrial sectors of
the economy. The manufacturing sector is to be dominant in terms of
contribution to the Gross Domestic Product of any economy especially that of
Nigeria (Auty 1993).
1.2 Statement Of The Research Problem
The malfunctioning of industrial sector in a country is widely seen as a major
handicap improving a country‟s economy and power pushing many
governments to encourage or enforce industrialization (Wikipedia free
encyclopaedia). One of the problems bedevilling the Nigeria economy is that of
output from its industrial sector of the economy. Admittedly the decay in the
manufacturing sector is the result of diverse factors that conspire to render many
industries comatose (ill). The study is therefore necessary to enable a thorough
investigation of the problems of the industrial sector especially that of
manufacturing industries and various government agencies set up to provide
credit facilities to the industrial sector to ensure continual growth of this sector
for rapid economic development of this nation. In the light of this exposition
the research work is guided by the following question.
1. What is the impact of industrial output on economic growth of
Nigeria?
2. What are the roles of manufacturing industries in the development of
the Nigerian economy?
1.3 Objectives Of The Study
The broad objective of this study is to examine the impact of industrial on
economic growth in Nigeria between the periods of (1980-2010).
The specific objective includes
1. To appraise the origin and structure of Nigeria‟s manufacture sector.
2. To analyse industrial output and to determine the effect it has on the
economic growth and development of the country.
3. To recommend possible solutions to the country‟s manufacturing
sector.
1.4 Statement Of Research Hypothesis
The hypothesis of this study is stated as follows:
Ho: Industrial output rate has no significant impact on the level of
economic growth (GDP).
H1: Industrial output rate has profound significant impact on the level of
economic growth (GDP).
1.5 Significance Of The Study
The significance of this study lies in the fact that the work will expose the
extent of which industrial output has contributed to economic growth in Nigeria
thereby highlighting some obstacles hindering increase in industrial output. This
work will be relevant to the government policies and entrepreneurs directing
them on industrial development plan. It adds to the already existing literature on
industrial output in Nigeria.
Furthermore the work will assist potential industrialist economist investors
and other related users of this veritable material in this field of study it is
interesting to know that industrial output is the shortest route to economic
development.
1.6 Scope Of The Study
The researcher tends to find out the impact of industrial output on economic
growth. The study covers a general contribution of manufacturing industries in
Nigeria toward the attainment of economic growth from (1980-2010).
1.7 Methodology and Sources of Data
The validity and reliability of this research work will depend on the use of
statistical data using simple regression model and the hypothesis setting that
requires testing the validity of the analysis.
The researcher made use of secondary data obtained from the publications of
the Central Bank of Nigeria Central Bank of Nigeria statistical bulletin and the
annual report of accounts as well as resource materials from the library and the
internet.
1.8 Limitation Of The Study
A study of this nature cannot be researched without encountering constraints
some of which includes;
1. Finance: Financial constraint or inadequacy was the major limitation for
this research to gather materials logistics etc.
2. Data: There was a problem of acquiring all necessary data through the
researcher has to rely on the ones available.
Project Information
Price
NGN 3,000Pages
67Chapters
1 - 5Program type
barchelors degree
Additionnal content
HOW TO GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT ON the impact of industrial output on the economy of nigeria (1980-2010) INSTANTLY?
- Click on the Download Button below
- Fill in your card details with our SECURE payment partner
- Your project downloads automatically upon successful payment
- Chat with Our Instant Help Desk on +234 8039 416 816 for further assistance
Related topics
- a case study of imo state
- a study of small-scale farmers in bende local government area of abia sate
- a case study of first bank of nigeria
- a case study of nigeria agricultural cooperative and rural development bank
- a case study of the telecommunication sector in nigeria (2000-1-2010-4)